facebook Kool-Aid ?

Posted on May 31st, 2007 by Wayt King.

Once every year or two some new web business model or web technical innovation catches my eye and gives me a rush of manic adrenaline: Oh My GOD, The World Has Changed, This Is Huge, Massive Value Will Be Created/Destroyed, Don’t Ya’ll See What This Means? My wife chuckles and rolls her eyes (’here we go again, Wayt’). I guess that’s what it means to be a web business model geek. Sigh. Usually these Profound Insights of mine are off the mark; sometimes way off. Occasionally I’m right, and I kick myself later for not acting on the Profound Insight. [Note that a broken clock is nonetheless right twice a day.]

Last Thursday facebook announced its new Platform. Basically, the facebook Platform enables any app developer to overlay their app on the facebook social network, on what facebook’s 23-yr-old Adidas-sandals-wearing CEO calls the “social graph” of connections among its 20 million active members. Just pick any existing Internet application, and picture it through a ‘lens’ that is the people you know and trust. That ‘lens’ is the facebook social graph. What are your friends buying? reading? listening to? doing tonight? eating? working on? concerned about? Look at your web site bookmarks list, and picture those web sites through the ‘lens.’

While MySpace is (currently) much bigger, facebook’s clean design is much more usable. While MySpace views third party apps suspiciously, facebook’s strategy is to let a thousand independent app flowers bloom on its Platform, to give its members the Darwinian freedom to pick the winning apps, and to expand and enrich the ’social graph.’ And to make money from the ads.

For many people, facebook will soon BE the Internet, much like MySpace IS the Internet to lots of junior high kids. If this strikes you as crazy, ask any 20 year old.

As I’m writing this, hackers are furiously coding new apps-on-facebook in dorm rooms and apartments and coffee shops worldwide (I know of one in ATL), some of which will grow to become large businesses.

I wish I wasn’t such an old fart. I think this is a unique time in history. Thanks to cheap bandwidth/computing/storage power, open-source software, hyper-productive programming languages, and viral digital marketing, three coders with $50K can accomplish in three months the same thing that in 2002 required ten coders working a year with $500K. That’s the impetus behind the YCombinator-for-Atlanta talk. And the coders coming out now are part of the MySpace generation - they’ve come of age living a digitized social life. It’s intuitively obvious to them how to take advantage of the social graph. I’m jealous.

Prediction: In 18 months, facebook will be a public company with a $10B market cap.

Hope: In 18 months, five teams of under-30 ATL coders will have built app-on-facebook businesses that VCs plead to invest in.

Question: Is this opportunity so big that we could focus YCombinator-for-Atlanta on apps for the facebook Platform? Or am I just drinking the Kool-Aid?

wayt

Make A Comment: ( 5 so far )

blockquote and a tags work here.

5 Responses to “facebook Kool-Aid ?”

It is an exciting announcement. Facebook has clearly shown how they plan to delineate themselves from MySpace. Personally, I think a little caution is in order here. Facebook is not truly a platform. No more than AOL was in the 90s. But, what they may offer is a great distribution vehicle. I think the key question is how you monetize your MySpace/Facebook widgets. Our super secret plan is to build Netvibes/Pageflake/iGoogle/MySpace/Facebook widgets and use that to drive awareness of Big Contacts. Then make money off the upgraded business version.

If you want to see something that I really get excited about, look at Google Gears. This was just announced today.

Paul Freet
May 31st, 2007

Answer: The opportunity to focus on Web apps that utilize a widget distribution strategy to inexpensively gain wide market acceptance is big enough. Limiting it to facebook seems, well, a bit limiting.

And Paul is right. Gears is big news. The ability to run a web app locally when not connected to the network is huge. Not having access to resources when not online is a big deterrent to the adoption of many online apps. Gears removes that barrier.

Lance Weatherby
June 1st, 2007

I think facebook provides much more than just another widget distribution channel - it provides deep integration into the facebook functionality itself.
Let’s use restaurant booking service OpenTable as an example. If I’m OpenTable, sure, I can try to get viral distribution of table-booking widgets on MySpace, LinkedIn, facebook, hi5, Bebo, etc. It’s a good distribution strategy.
But if I’m OpenTable, I can do much more than “just” widgetize the service and seek distribution using the facebook Platform: I can offer Opentable-on-facebook as an application within (deeply integrated into) facebook, enabling users to organize and schedule dinners among their friends, for example, without a lot of phone calling and emailing back and forth. The key premise is that users will be on facebook (”checking my facebook”) for extended periods several times daily (ask a 20-year-old). See this Anatomy of a Facebook Application: http://developers.facebook.com/anatomy.php
Evite is another example of a web app that would thrive on facebook’s Platform. As would any app/service that could leverage the connections among your friends/colleagues/family.
So: since the facebook Platform enables deep functionality into the social network that is explode, the app opportunity here is much bigger than the (albeit attractive) widget distribution opportunity also presented by the other social networks.
Re Google Gears, I must admit that I don’t see the significance beyond the ability to take web apps offline occasionally. See today’s Read/Write Web analysis: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ria_what_is_it_good_for.php

Thanks for the comments, guys - strong opinions are good!
wayt

Wayt King
June 1st, 2007

My heads hurts reading all those big words, but I’m a believer!

Knox Massey
June 2nd, 2007

Wayt, you are correct about the value gained by deep integration with Facebook. I guess my concern is the same one I’d have about building on top of App Exchange. You become a part of someone else’s ecosystem. Terms of service can change at any time. That is a risky proposition for any startup. And a safer one at the exact same time. What a dilemma.

Paul Freet
June 4th, 2007

Where's The Comment Form?

About

Big Thinkr is a collection of former, current, and repeat entrepreneurs trying to improve the entrepreneurial community in Atlanta, Georgia, and the Southeast.

Blogs that link here

Contributors

Subscribe

Upcoming Events

Topics

Archives

-->